Month: January 2018

sports industry, Sports Law, WADA

WADA CODE : INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR THERAPEUTIC USE EXEMPTIONS

The International Standard for Therapeutic Use Exemptions is a mandatory International Standard developed as part of the World Anti-Doping Program. The purpose of the International Standard for Therapeutic Use Exemptions is to establish (a) the conditions that must be satisfied in order for a Therapeutic Use Exemption (or TUE) to be granted, permitting the presence of a Prohibited Substance in an Athlete’s Sample or the … Continue reading WADA CODE : INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR THERAPEUTIC USE EXEMPTIONS

Tejaswini RanjanLeave a comment
Arbitration, football, sports industry, Sports Law

Bringing Football back in Kuwait : FIFA decides to appoint Normalisation Committee

On 16 October 2015, the Kuwait Football Association (KFA) was suspended to effect the change in sports law of Kuwait. As a result of this decision, no team from Kuwait of any sort (including clubs) could have had any international sporting contact (art. 14 par. 3 of the FIFA Statutes), and neither the KFA nor any of its members or officials can benefit from any development … Continue reading Bringing Football back in Kuwait : FIFA decides to appoint Normalisation Committee

Tejaswini RanjanLeave a comment
Arbitration, Case Studies, football, sports industry, Sports Law

FIFA against match manipulation & ban on Joseph Odartei Lamptey

FACTS : Shortly after the 2018 FIFA World Cup Russia qualifying match between South Africa and Senegal on 12 November 2016, several betting operators (among them, in particular, FIFA’s current integrity partner, Sportradar) made FIFA aware that the result of the match may have been influenced due to irregular and suspicious live betting activities that had occurred. The FIFA Integrity Department carried out a thorough … Continue reading FIFA against match manipulation & ban on Joseph Odartei Lamptey

Tejaswini RanjanLeave a comment
Arbitration, cricket, sports industry, Sports Law, WADA

BCCI charges Yusuf Pathan under Anti-Doping Rule Violation (Article 2.1) & How BCCI examines Anti-Doping Rule Violation?

On 27th October 2017, Yusuf Pathan was charged with the commission of an Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) under the BCCI Anti-Doping Rules (ADR) Article 2.1 and provisionally suspended pending determination of the charge. Yusuf Pathan responded to the charge by admitting the ADRV and asserting that it was caused by his ingestion of a medication containing Terbutaline that had been mistakenly given to him instead … Continue reading BCCI charges Yusuf Pathan under Anti-Doping Rule Violation (Article 2.1) & How BCCI examines Anti-Doping Rule Violation?

Tejaswini RanjanLeave a comment